Friday, September 24, 2010

Multi-Million Dollar Divorces Bring a Unique and Complex Set of Issues

When you think of high-profile divorce cases at which millions of dollars are at stake, perhaps your first inclination is to think of the celebrities who find themselves in a court room somewhere near the movie and music studios that employ them. Certainly, these contentious battles receive the most media coverage, as recent divorces involving Madonna, Paul McCartney and Mel Gibson demonstrate. We come to learn about every asset of these famous men and women, down to the nickels and dimes, as well as every alleged indiscretion that may have led to the couple staring one another down in a courtroom. However, the dissolution of wealthy marriages does not just occur in Hollywood or the pages of tabloids. The reality is that divorces with large financial stakes are playing out all the time in every state, just usually without the glare of the paparazzi's lens. Right here in Texas, dividing assets that are worth upwards of seven or eight figures is not unusual. Family law attorneys who wish to handle such cases must be almost as experienced in finance, accounting, and tax structures as they are in the matters of child support and marriage contracts.

Did you know that the current economic recession has actually played a role in increasing the number of wealthy couples who are filing for divorce? While overall, according to the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, divorces tend to decline with an economic downtown, those with a tremendous amount of assets do not follow the trend. Instead, the number of inquiries to divorce attorneys from potential clients with a great deal of wealth increased by forty percent over the past year. During a recession, you can expect that a couple's assets will decrease in value, from the family home to the high-risk investments to the 401(k) account. By making the decision to split when values are low, individuals will be obligated to provide less to a spouse in a resolution. If a marriage was already shaky or wholly dependent on the good times of a thriving economy to make the union bearable through material gains , a recession is going to make such partnerships all the more susceptible to the addition of a divorce lawyer or two into the relationship.

Divorce is never an easy process for a couple of navigate. These proceedings usually come with heightened and mixed emotions, an intense sense of grief and, if there are children involved, concern over what is best in terms of visitation and financial support. However, there is an additional set of complex issues that come into play with the two people who are separating are worth millions of dollars. If you are in this situation, you need to make sure that you are working with a family law attorney who specializes in such cases. Just think about all of the financial consequences that come from the dissolution of such a union. Property such as investment portfolios, time shares, art collections, equity in businesses, compensation packages, and other assets that are unique to the wealthy members of our population all can become points of contention for two people who both offer legitimate claims to their worth. The level of negotiation goes way beyond which person gets the newer car and how many nights the kids will stay at each house. These high-stakes divorce cases become complex business deals similar to the dissolution of a corporation. In Texas, these assets tend to take the form of oil and gas investments, securities, corporate ownerships, and large amounts of physical property. Texas has no shortage of men and women who have made fortunes off our state's natural resources and impressive human capital, and they want to hold onto the fruits of their labor.

In addition to the property that is known and shared by both partners in a marriage, attorneys who are handling the divorce of a wealthy client also must consider the possibility that the other spouse is intentionally hiding some assets in order to lower the final amount of a settlement. When necessary, forensic experts in accounting, banking, business management, and other specialized fields may be retained to ensure that all investments are located and protected. If you believe that your estranged husband or wife may be hiding some sources of income, you need to make sure that you are hiring a lawyer with the professional resources and knowledge to know where to look to find hidden assets like offshore bank accounts, deferred compensation, tax shelters and other sources of income that must be included as community property.

When negotiating divorce settlements in Texas, attorneys must work under the fact that we are a "community property" state. This means that most property acquired during the marriage will be subject to an equitable division in a divorce settlement or trial. Even if one spouse was the sole source of income and therefore provided the money for the homes, cars, investments, etc., both partners have equal claim on these assets when a separation occurs. While a judge always will start with the assumption of a 50/50 split, various factors, such as the fault in the break-up of the marriage and the value of the assets of property, may shift the final decision.

In addition to the splitting of assets, a wealthy couple often faces the question of spousal support or alimony. When both members of a partnership become accustomed to a particular standard of living, battles may be fought if the ability to maintain the same existence is threatened. What expectations should one spouse have for financial support if he or she did not provide the primary source of income during the marriage? In Texas, spousal support is not an assumed component of the divorce settlement. Instead, a judge will examine factors such as the employment and education skills of the spouse, the duration of the marriage, the physical and emotional condition of the spouse, the need to care for children in the home, and possible marital misconduct. The decision can be made to provide either temporary spousal support or more long-term assistance. When dealing with couples who are used to budgeting with millions of dollars at their disposal, awards of spousal support can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars every month.

It is often said that everything is done bigger in Texas, from our food to our sports to our love of the outdoors. The same idea often holds true concerning the divorces that take place between some of the most wealthy and high-profile residents of our state. These marriages are not just unions of love and the foundation of families, but also complex business partnerships. With all of the money at stake, there are divorce attorneys who specialize in the dissolution of high-dollar marriages. If you find yourself in the position of needing legal representation in the face of an ending marriage and the financial consequences of the split are significant, it is imperative that you find an attorney who displays great comfort with discussions of investment portfolios, vacation homes, and antique heirlooms. If these conversations do not occur with ease, move on until you find an attorney who provides you the needed confidence that a difficult time in your life will be made as easy as possible.




Tony R. Bertolino is the managing partner at Bertolino LLP with law offices located in Austin, Houston and San Antonio, Texas. A member of the Trial and Appellate Litigation Team, Mr. Bertolino's practice is devoted largely to complex transactions, commercial litigation, business law, entertainment law and family law matters. You can read more about Mr. Bertolino at http://www.belolaw.com

Auto Quote loan consolidation

Sunday, September 19, 2010

SC disqualifies Sharif brothers

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Wednesday in a short order disqualified Mian Nawaz Sharif and Mian Shahbaz Sharif in eligibility case. After completion of arguments of Attorney General Sardar Latif Khosa a three-member bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Moosa K.Leghari, Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali announced the short order of disqualification of Sharif brothers which says, all the petitions are dismissed except petition of Sayed Khurram Shah and notification of the Election Commission is declared null and void. Justice Sheikh Hakim Ali in his remarks said that the Supreme Court has the right to stop any ineligible person to become a member of the Parliament. The apex court also upheld the verdict of the Lahore High Court. The Federation had filed appeals in the apex court against the disqualification of PML-N chief Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif and had challenged the June 24 Lahore High Court (LHC) order to set up an election tribunal to decide the eligibility of Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif. These appeals were filed under Article 185(3) of the Constitution, citing Mian Shahbaz Sharif, the Returning Officer PP-48, Bhakkar-II, the Election Appellate Tribunal for PP-48, Bhakkar-II, Lahore High Court, Chief Election Commissioner and Syed Khurram Shah as respondents.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrZE2zjqBKA&hl=en

low refinance apple valley mortgage

Monday, August 23, 2010

How to Appeal Your IRS Audit

Let's say your tax return is examined by the IRS and you do not agree with the results of the examination.  What happens next?  Are you just stuck in the mud or can you take the matter higher up?  Luckily for taxpayers today, further appeal within the IRS is permitted.

When the IRS has concluded its audit it then issues what's known as a "30-day letter."  This is a letter that gives you exactly 30 days in which to act.  If you get one of these during your IRS audit and don't know what to do, please consider calling a tax lawyer for help. 

Once the IRS has issued a preliminary 30-day letter, you have the right to appeal to a local Appeals Office by filing a written request for appellate consideration. This is the only level of appeal within the IRS. Appeals conferences are conducted in an informal manner, meaning that you can have the appeals conference by telephone and simply tell your side of the story.  The IRS agent who did the audit will seldom if ever be on the phone with you, just the appeals officer.

A taxpayer who requests a conference may also need to file a formal written protest. However, if the protested amount is not more than $25,000, you may want to consider making a small case request instead of a formal written protest ( IRS Publication 556).  You should also know that in addition to appeal or in lieu of appeal there's another avenue open to you.  If you decide to forego the right to submit a protest to the Appeals Office after receiving a 30-day letter you can still file a petition in the Tax Court within 90 days after the receipt of a statutory notice of deficiency.  That's a whole other article.

Here's another insight.  Small business and self-employed taxpayers can resolve their IRS audit disputes through what's known as fast-track mediation. Disputes can be resolved through this expedited process within 40 days, compared to several months using the regular appeals process.

If you represent a large or mid-sized business, you can resolve their tax disputes through a fast-track settlement program. The goal for this program is to reach settlement within 120 days. A similar fast-track settlement program for small businesses and self-employed taxpayers is being tested by the IRS but no word of its status has been released yet.

Here's your takeaway:  many taxpayers try to represent themselves during an IRS tax audit.  They usually have varying degrees of success, especially when compared with the much more professional approach taken by tax lawyers.  At any rate, if you're dissatisfied with the result of your audit, by all means call a tax lawyer for help with an appeal.  It just may be worth every penny and much more!




by: John Ellsworth, Tax Attorney at http://www.IRS-SOLV.com Want to know more? Come to IRS-SOLV and read other articles. Thank you.

equity loans albuquerque home car donations

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Division of Property During a Divorce

In a Divorce proceeding, the Court has the power to "justly and equitably" award property. Therefore, it is extremely important to note that the Court does not automatically apportion property division at fifty percent (50%) to each party. In many cases, the interpretation of "just and equitable" has meant an award of fifty percent (50%); however, this is always subject to the specific circumstances of the Divorce case.

The Court has the authority to divide "marital property." Therefore, it is helpful to develop a chart or summary of all of the marital assets as well as non-marital assets. Marital assets include anything of value that is accumulated after the date of marriage. This includes, but is not limited to, cash, accounts, investments, pension, 401(k) plans, real estate, investment property, business interests, or personal property items. Anything that has value and that was accumulated after the date of marriage is considered marital property and is subject to division by the Court.

Non-marital property is property that was either brought into the marriage by one party (e.g. a vehicle that was owned outright by one spouse before he or she got married) or if the property was received as a result of an inheritance during the marriage or was given as an exclusive gift to that particular party during the marriage. It is important to note that the Court assumes that all property is marital unless one party establishes to the satisfaction of the Court that it has a valid non-marital claim. This is typically done by "tracing" (showing a chain of events along with supporting documentation that would lead the Court to believe that the property was non-marital in nature). It is also important that the non-marital property is not "commingled" with marital property. For example, if one party receives an inheritance of $10,000, to retain its non-marital nature, it should be separate and apart from any marital funds and should not be "commingled" in a joint account.

In determining issues relative to property and debt, one of the most popular misconceptions is that title (who is listed as the named owner of the property) is important. Whether it is a vehicle, a pension plan, a 401(k) plan or any other asset, title is not the controlling factor relative to dividing an asset. If it was accumulated during the marriage, it is marital property regardless of whose name it is titled under. Another important consideration when analyzing and agreeing to a property division is that it is final. Once the Court signs a Divorce Decree, which gives an award of property to both sides, it is final. Absent extremely rare circumstances, it can never be changed.

When analyzing the property division, it is almost always a good idea to award an asset to a party who also is the debtor on that particular asset. For example, if one party is driving a Lexus motor vehicle and he/she is named on the loan or lease for that vehicle, he or she should be awarded that vehicle subject to the loan so that there is no confusion on the part of any party as to who will service that particular debt.




Farhan Hassan concentrates his practice on all areas of family law with a specialty in divorce, including custody, spousal maintenance, complex property issues, as well as appellate practice. Please visit http://www.allaboutdivorcemn.com for specific conversations about getting a divorce in Minnesota.

personal injury law auto ins loans consolidate

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Jaburg Wilk Client Testimonials

Located in downtown Phoenix, Jaburg & Wilk is a full-service, mid sized, AV-rated law firm. Our attorneys work to create practical, cost-effective solutions for those who drive business. Jaburg Wilk is a business law firm with experienced and knowledgeable attorneys in the following practice areas: Appellate Bankruptcy Business/ Corporate Law Business Divorce Collections Creditors Rights Workouts Construction Law Corporate Transactions Defamation Employment Law Escrow Estate Planning Family Law Financial Fraud Foreclosure Franchise Law Healthcare Law In-House Counsel Insurance Coverage Intellectual Property Litigation Pest Control Probate Litigation Real estate



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzXlbvEfqrw&hl=en

personal loan ameratrade antivirus appliance

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Judge Sotomayor's Opening Statement - Senate Confirmation Hearing

Judge Sonia Sotomayor delivers her opening statement during the first day of her confirmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Once confirmed, Sotomayor would be the first Hispanic and third woman to serve on the United State Supreme Court.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgimID6nsNI&hl=en

automotive leads Anti Service Spam automobile insurance

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Mike Lee for US Senate campaign announcement (Part 2)

Utah Republican Mike Lee officially announces his candidacy for the US Senate. For more information, please visit www.mikelee2010.com Mike Lee is a scholar and passionate defender of the Constitution. He has spoken to thousands of people about the importance of and the need to preserve the Constitution. Everything from the Due Process Clause to the Presentment Clause was discussed around the Lee family's dinner table, almost in the same way many families talk about the weather, school, or the day's events. As a result, at a very young age Mike acquired a great love of and admiration for the Constitution and for the principles it is based on. After graduating from Law School in 1997, he served as a law clerk to Judge Dee Benson of the US District Court for the District of Utah. Following his time with Judge Benson he clerked for then-Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr., who was serving at that time on the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court. From there he went into private practice, joining the Washington, DC office of Sidley & Austin, where he specialized in appellate and Supreme Court litigation. Several years later, Mike returned to Utah after being invited to serve as an Assistant US Attorney in Salt Lake City, preparing briefs and arguing cases before the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. He served as Governor Huntsmans General Counsel from January 2005 until June 2006, when he returned to Washington to serve a one-year clerkship at the US Supreme Court ...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lDU7zVjmqo&hl=en

Refinance Information Auto Geico Insurance